The American way of dealing with conflict, according to the article, is rivalry. This might non be the best way, and its definitely not the solely way. The article serves the purpose of exploring the cultural differences in how others deal with conflict. It provides alternatives and incompatible ideas in how to resolve conflicts, as oppose to arguing.
Arguing is a method of dealing with conflict. In the argument culture most everything is framed as a battle or farinaceous in which winning or losing is the main concern. The pillars of argument repose on this win-lose idea. Argument is expressed through polarized, two sided, debates and battles. The moment elicits a winner and a resolved conflict.
This method is norm every(prenominal)y used in the Western culture in general, and in the United States in particular. It is also used by individuals of Eastern European background, Jewish tradition, and in some Indian cultures.
Joanna Repczynski, for exemplar, had an experience in her visit to France. Her array kept initiating a heated intellectual debate everywhere dinner. When Joanna agreed, another argument would be on its way. Another example is Andrea Talarico. When her Italian-American family argues, their voices would raise and objects would be thrown in an intense countersign. Another example is the Japanese woman who is married to a Frenchman.
The Frenchman started arguments with his wife. Finally when she argued back, he was overjoyed rather than getting upset.
The advantages of arguments be various. In the case of Joanna and her host, the host felt as if arguing would keep things interesting. Agreement was just to boring. Andrea sees advantages to her Italian-American familys panache: We always know how each other feels at all times. This is a sign of her familys closeness. The Frenchman was overjoyed that his wife argued...
If you exigency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment