I visited the Los Angeles County M officeum of Art to view the exhibit Cezanne and Pissarro: Pioneering Painting, 1865-1885. The exhibit was intended to imbibe the artistic relationship between Paul Cezanne and Camille Pissarro in their embellish paintings, still lifes, and some works they bring forthd side by side, during the forenamed era period. Both Cezanne and Pissarro were pioneers of the Impressionist movement, although both moved on to create artwork that would be categorized otherwise, later in their careers. The Impressionists were elicit in the effects of light on objects and frequently multi-coloured plein aire to capture these effects. They were also interested in experimenting with brushstroke, the application of paint, and the use of color.
As I viewed the artworks in the exhibit, I slowly began to realize the differences in style and, in a few instances, the subtle differences that Pissarro and Cezanne somatic in their application of paint, construction of form, and the projected overall pettishness of their artworks. At first, I was unable to pin down the unlike sets of style each artist applied to their artworks; I was lonesome(prenominal) able to view the similarities of each. However, after moving on to the thirdly room of paintings, I began to understand the unique stylistic differences apply by the artists, which were continually represented in most of the artworks.
I chose to interest Pissarros Small Bridge, Pontoise, made in 1875, to Cezannes The Bridge at Maincy most Melun, made from 1879-1880. During the time these artworks were made, as mentioned above, many Impressionists engaged in plein aire painting to experiment with time the restrained process and the diverse types of light effects during the different hours of the day. During this period, these types of work were rebellions against the traditional paintings of the french Academy and...If you want to get a full essay, coiffure it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper