English 1101 B5 December 10, 2001 Final Paper In our lifetimes, if ever, it is serious to theorise anything approaching a consensus on technologys plant in the gentlemans gentleman. Perhaps, it is beca single-valued function human beings fail to take into account technologys inherent unpredictability. There is one theorist, Bruno Latour, that captures technologys addictive nature. other theorist, Leo Marx, illuminates its fateful nature, which is that technological procession is unstoppable, wondrous and destructive. Both seem to predict the future of the world as it seen in the movie, The Matrix. Latours view of technology is that it comes from a wish to do good and improve life. He uses the standard of a entrée to demonstrate the concept of dependance of machines. The door is the machine that people marveled at, when it was introduced, not knowing that it brought problems. Who would close it? Who would feed it? Would it be too heavy for certain people? Would the lymph gland be too low or too utmost for certain people? All problems would be fixed with a groom a man or boy that would do the service of opening and closing the door. However, what if the boy did not supply up to work? Or, it was just raining too hard to go to work? Who would shut the door then?
Another technological advance came along and the hydraulic system was introduced. volume marveled at this invention. Nonetheless, it too had problems. It automatically shut and discriminated against those who could not land in quickly enough.
The door serves as a use of delegation. The door is delegated a job and in return delegates ascendency over the humans who use it. It delegates authority in a form of rules. It causes people to behave a certain way. An suit of its authority would be, having to...
If you want to get a full essay, establish it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment