Aristotle and his Concept of Psychology

However, the gist of his viewpoint is that psychology is the get h superannuated of of the soul and the soul is the aspect of world which separates the animise world from the inanimate world. In other words, that which has soul is animate, term that which does not possess soul is inanimate. Again, there is preference verbalized in this dualism, in that soul and the animate are preferred. This has helped pull in the modern environmental problem as well as helped shape the way we define modern psychology.

For Aristotle, the soul expresses "the found of a natural body having life potentially inside it" (Leahey, 2000, 84). Unlike later thinkers, however, Aristotle thought that all living things had souls that were their total form and defined their nature. His concept is of soul as some(prenominal) being/becoming, potential and actualization, as essential and final execute of each organism. We are who and what we are because of our souls. To study pitying psychology, then, is to study our souls and to discern what the essence of that form comprises. One of the interesting things almost Aristotle that Leahey pointed out is that he is not a dualist in monetary value of separating body and soul; instead, they are inseparable, with the soul infused so deep in the body, or interdependent with it, that there is no human race being separate from it. There is no separate body, no separate flesh, without soul.

Unfortunately, however, Aristotle distinguis

Aristotle. (1996). On stay and dreams. Classical texts series. David Brown Book Co.

Malina, B.J. (1981). The New Testament world. Louisville, KY: antic Knox Press.

There are those who would contend that before Darwin, the only scientific thinker worth mentioned is Aristotle. Further, Fukuyama (1999) stated that except for his lack of fellow feeling of the human genome, Aristotle was the thinker most accurate in his passage of human nature and the psychology of the human being. Fukuyama's view is a basically conservative one, asserting that human nature does not change much, yet though society may go through and through periodic disruptions. Instead, there will be quantify of chaos, but social norms will tend to reassert themselves everywhere time.

Basically, Fukuyama indicated that people will tend to reconstruct the same old social norms and assert the same old values. It is, according to him, build into human nature, rather than the product of religion or even government. It is the common sense that Aristotle placed in his structure of the human soul that will lead them to do this.

Robinson, D. (1999). Aristotle's psychology. University of Wisconsin Press.

The psychology that Aristotle promulgated through his philosophical and scientific works was one which see people developing through the context of community, and relationship, rather than through the nuclear family. He described theories of perception, learning, memory, motivation, emotion, and the growing of ethics or moral virtue. All of these were grounded in an understanding of the human being as possessing natural capacities that were fundamentally good (Robinson, 1999). Filtered through doubting Thomas and others, however, the Aristotle that Freud worked with was a misinterpreted one, and Freud contributed to that misinterpretation or distortion in his development of modern psychology as a study of body and mind in conflict, and human beings and community in conflict.

hed fiddle
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!