Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Comparing Virtue and Vice in Garrick’s Romeo and Juliet and Bowdler’s R

Virtue versus vice is of great concern in the 18th century, an come out of the closet that ca consumptions a major shift in the presentation of plays on the stage. stratum writers adapted well-known plays to meet the criteria and expectations of the time. Contri besidesing to the overall acceptance of righteousness on stage is the enforcement of decency and cleanliness by both the ruling class and the audience. A famous actor of the time, David Garrick, non only abided by these rules but in like manner worked them to his advantage. Garrick packed theater houses with his talent and versatility as an actor, while at the similar time promoting an acceptance of cleaner versions of plays. Many of these adapted plays were by Shakespeare, though Garrick himself wrote plays that were as universally accepted. Audiences today may criticize the inadequacy of these adaptations, but during the 18th century audiences expected and loved them. What were these changes exactly and where did they originate? Garrick himself does not begin this movement towards virtue, but simply accepts the changes present. In 1698, Jeremy Collier wrote A Short View of the Immortality and Profaneness of the English Stage. This piece strongly attacks the flow rate conditions of the theater and the various immoral works by certain authors currently published. The Longman Anthology of British Literature writes, by portraying wickedness in ship canal that give delight, Jeremy Collier argued contemporary plays cultivated in their audiences the vices of their characters (2270 Longman Anthology of British Literature). These authors include such notable minds as John Dryden, William Congreve and William Wycherley. Collier especially criticizes the profane use of language and the abuse of clergy all of which, he felt, manage... ...sctn=1Garrick, David. The Dramatic whole kit of David Garrick, Esq. Vo. 1 London, 1798.Greenbalt, ed. The Norton Shakespeare Based on theOxford Edition. New York Lond on, 1997.Frye, Northrop. Essay date 1986. severalize W. Scott, ed. pgs 575-579.Hume, Robert D. Before the Bard Shakespeare in Early Eighteenth-Century London. ELH 64.1 (1997) 41-75.November 14, 2000. <http//muse.jhu.edu/journals/elh/v064/64.1hume.html.Jameson, Anna Brownell. Essay date 1833. loot W. Scott, ed. pgs 423-425.Knight, Joseph. David Garrick Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800. Vol. 15. November 7, 2000.http//galenet.com/serv/LitRC/hitsc=1&b=17171779&savedsrch=&NR=Garrick&OP=contains&DT=Author+RE.Scott, Mark W. ed. Shakespeare Criticism. Kansas city Gale Research Company, 1987.Ulrici, Hermann. Essay date 1847. Mark W. Scott, ed. pgs 427-428.

No comments:

Post a Comment